A Review on Impact of Image Compression Techniques on Face Recognition Accuracy
Keywords:
Image compression, Lossless and Lossy compression, Face Recognition, Face recognition techniqueAbstract
Face recognition as well as identification in surveillance including security applications often need a very effective facial image compression technique. However, only heuristic refinement of codec is made as per face verification accuracy parameter when using either regular general image codecs or particular facial image compression techniques. Image as well as video-based face recognition systems are the becoming a hot research area because of the increasing use of face identification in daily life. Face recognition researchers are presently focusing their attention on the effects of factors such as posture, lighting, and expression. Despite the fact that most photos are saved and/or delivered in a compressed format, little research has been done just on impact of the compression on the face recognition. Face-recognition algorithms are compared in a still-to-still setting with the uncompressed training as well as gallery photos, as well as the various compression ratios for the probing images, in such paper's review.
References
[1] Alorf, A. A. (2017). Performance evaluation of the PCA versus improved PCA (IPCA) in image compression, and in face detection and recognition. FTC 2016 - Proceedings of Future Technologies Conference, December, 537-546. https://doi.org/10.1109/FTC.2016.7821659
[2] Calderoni, L., & Magnani, A. (2022). The impact of face image compression in future generation electronic identity documents. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 40, 301345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2022.301345
[3] Chen, Z., & He, T. (2019). Learning based Facial Image Compression with semantic fidelity metric. Neurocomputing, 338(xxxx), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.086
[4] Delac, K., Grgic, M., & Grgic, S. (2005). Effects of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression on face recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3687 LNCS, 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/11552499_16
[5] Hladnik, A. (2013). Image compression and face recognition : Two image processing applications of Principal component analysis. International Circular of Graphic Education and Research, 6(May), 56-61.
[6] Liu, Y. R., & Kau, L. J. (2017). Scalable face image compression based on Principal Component Analysis and arithmetic Coding. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Taiwan, ICCE-TW 2017, 265-266. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE-China.2017.7991097
[7] Matschitsch, S., Tschinder, M., & Uhl, A. (2007). Comparison of compression algorithms' impact on iris recognition accuracy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4642 LNCS, 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74549-5_25
[8] Mizoguchi, T. (2017). Evaluation of image sensors. Image Sensors and Signal Processing for Digital Still Cameras, 179-204. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420026856
[9] Mofarreh-Bonab, M. (2016). A New Technique for Image Compression Using PCA. International Journal of Computer …, 2(1), 111-116. http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=fulltext&aId=979857
[10] Ram, I., Cohen, I., & Elad, M. (2014). Facial image compression using patch-ordering-based adaptive wavelet transform. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 21(10), 1270-1274. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2014.2332276
[11] Rizk, M. R. M., & Koosha, E. M. (2006). A comparison of principal component analysis and generalized Hebbian algorithm for image compression and face recognition. 2006 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems, ICCES'06, 8, 214-219. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES.2006.320450
[12] Yan, J., Muraleedharan, R., Ye, X., & Osadciw, L. A. (2008). Contourlet based image compression for wireless communication in face recognition system. IEEE International Conference on Communications, 505-509. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2008.100
