Molecular Signatures of Crime: Biomarkers and Biochemical Evidence in Forensic Science

Authors

  • Shivani Solanki Forensic Science Expert

Keywords:

Molecular biomarkers, Forensic science, Biochemical evidence, Human identification, Multi-omics

Abstract

The molecular biomarkers have revolutionized forensic science by providing a powerful tool for the highly sensitive and reliable analysis of biological evidence in criminal investigations. The present review discusses the use of molecular signatures such as genetic, protein, metabolite, micro-biological and body fluid signatures for better forensic identification and evidence interpretation. It is concerned with the use of sophisticated analytical techniques like genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, spectroscopy, chromatography and mass spectrometry to find and characterize forensic samples with accuracy. The review also emphasizes the significance of molecular signatures in the identification of body fluids, estimation of post mortem interval, forensic toxicology, forensic pathology, human identification and crime scene reconstruction. Various challenges in current research, such as degradation of samples, ethical issues and standardisation of analytical protocols, are also discussed. Some innovations that are currently emerging, such as the use of artificial intelligence, the integration of multiple omics technologies, portable forensic technologies, and advanced bioinformatics are highlighted as potential tools to improve forensic investigations. Overall, molecular biomarkers give a solid scientific underpinning to precise forensic science and further enhance the reliability and credibility of modern criminal justice systems.

References

[1] F. Sessa and M. Salerno, “Special Issue ‘Molecular Biology in Forensic Science: Past, Present and Future,’” Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijms25052883.

[2] K. B. N. De Silva, K. S. Dharmasiri, M. P. A. A. Buddhadasa, and K. G. N. U. Ranaweera, “Criminal Investigation: A Brief Review Of Importance Of Biological Evidence,” Eur. Sch. J., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 8–12, 2021.

[3] V. Andersen et al., “Investigating the Crime Scene—Molecular Signatures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2023, doi: https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311217.

[4] T. Huebner, M. Steffens, and C. Scholl, “Molecular Genetic Techniques in Biomarker Analysis Relevant for Drugs Centrally Approved in Europe,” Mol. Diagn. Ther., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 89–103, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40291-021-00567-x.

[5] Chhikara, V. Gupta, P. Kumari, and J. Dalal, “Protein Biomarkers as Molecular Tools for Forensic Biofluid Identification,” J. Proteome Res., vol. 25, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00898.

[6] K. Lech et al., “Investigation of metabolites for estimating blood deposition time,” Int J Leg. Med, pp. 25–32, 2018, doi: DOI 10.1007/s00414-017-1638-y.

[7] D. A. Mohammed, O. A. Mahmoud, S. M. Ibrahim, F. B. Abed, A. Muhammed, and S. H. Muhi, “Serological Biomarkers in Forensic Science: A Review,” Baghdad J. Biochem. Appl. Biol. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 110–124, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.47419/bjbabs.v7i2.449.

[8] Z. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Li, and G. Zhang, “mRNA for Body Fluid and Individual Identification,” Electrophoresis, vol. 46, no. 1–2, pp. 44–55, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202400077.

[9] S. T. Gopukumar, V. R. Patil, E. Benedicto, S. Gupta, and A. Sankar, “Innovations in Analytical Chemistry for Biomarker Detection in Chronic Disease Management,” J. Appl. Bioanal., vol. 11, no. 4, 2025, doi: http://doi.org/10.53555/jab.v11i4.461.

[10] S. Tang, K. Yuan, and L. Chen, “Molecular biomarkers, network biomarkers, and dynamic network biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of rare diseases,” Fundam. Res., vol. 2, pp. 894–902, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2022.07.011.

[11] M. Babaei, S. Kashanian, H. Teck, and L. Frances, “Proteomics techniques in protein biomarker discovery,” Quant. Biol., vol. 12, pp. 53–69, 2024, doi: 10.1002/qub2.35.

[12] D. Vo and K. T. L. Trinh, “Emerging Biomarkers in Metabolomics: Advancements in Precision Health and Disease Diagnosis,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313190.

[13] S. Roy, J. Hauer, and K. Sankar, “Development of non-invasive diagnosis based on FTIR spectroscopy,” Vib. Spectrosc., vol. 134, p. 103724, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2024.103724.

[14] R. Sinha, B. Sharma, A. Sharma, and H. Pradesh, “Emerging Applications Of Microbial Forensics In Criminal Investigations: A Review,” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 86–93, 2025.

[15] H. Dash and A. Das, “Detection and identification of forensically relevant body fluids,” 2026, pp. 35–48. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-30128-5.00010-2.

[16] J. L. R. Lopez and M. P. Navadijo, “Estimation of the post-mortem interval: a review,” Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 369, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112412.

[17] M. S. Balbudhe, B. S. K. Shetty, N. A. Kumar, D. Singh, and A. I. Sherekar, “Crime scene reconstruction: a scoping review,” Egypt. J. Forensic Sci., vol. 15, no. 79, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-025-00495-5.

[18] Y. Sai, “Advancing forensic science: Addressing challenges and embracing emerging technologies,” Forensic Sci. Today, vol. 8, pp. 1–5, 2022, doi: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-5687.

[19] S. S. Daga, U. Ahmed, and R. K. Kumawat, “Forensic Tools and Techniques of Absolute Human Identification: Physical and Molecular Approach,” J. Forensic Sci. Crim. Investig., vol. 15, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.19080/JFSCI.2021.15.555913.

[20] M. Bhosale, R. Seth, and B. Nanhe, “Forensic DNA Biomarkers : Advancements and Applications in Criminal Investigations,” Biochem. Cell. Arch, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1297–1308, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.51470/bca.2023.23.2.1297.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-19

How to Cite

[1]
Shivani Solanki 2026. Molecular Signatures of Crime: Biomarkers and Biochemical Evidence in Forensic Science. AG Volumes. (Aug. 2026), 99–110.